JPG vs WebP: which should you use?
Short answer
Use WebP for the web: it is typically 25-35% smaller than JPG at the same quality and supports transparency. Use JPG when you need maximum compatibility with old software, email clients, or printers.
The core difference
Both are lossy photo formats, but WebP uses newer compression than JPG and reaches a smaller file at the same visible quality. WebP also supports transparency and animation, which JPG cannot do. The trade-off is compatibility: JPG opens everywhere, while a few older tools still choke on WebP.
When to use WebP
- Images on a website or web app, where page weight matters
- Photos that need a transparent background (JPG cannot)
- Anywhere you control the viewer and know it supports WebP
When to stay on JPG
- Maximum compatibility with old apps, email clients, and printers
- Sharing with people who may open the file in legacy software
- Workflows that require JPG, such as some photo-print services